<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blindly optimistic or blindingly obvious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/blindly-optimistic-or-blindingly-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/blindly-optimistic-or-blindingly-obvious/</link>
	<description>Logistics for global health and aid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Humourless Lot&#187; Logistics, health and aid: The public/private mix in health logistics</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/blindly-optimistic-or-blindingly-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>A Humourless Lot&#187; Logistics, health and aid: The public/private mix in health logistics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 09:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=83#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>[...] time back I went on a tangent to rant about the wisdom (or rather, the lack thereof) of concentrating on the public sector for health, to the detriment of the private sector. The word “logistics” was conspicuously absent in that post, a lacuna that I am going to repair [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time back I went on a tangent to rant about the wisdom (or rather, the lack thereof) of concentrating on the public sector for health, to the detriment of the private sector. The word “logistics” was conspicuously absent in that post, a lacuna that I am going to repair [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
