<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The logistics of logistics, or: why logistics solutions never work here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/</link>
	<description>Logistics for global health and aid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 17:45:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Humourless Lot&#187; Mountain goats, beer, and logistics: a game &#8211; Logistics for health and aid: A humourless lot</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/#comment-10016</link>
		<dc:creator>A Humourless Lot&#187; Mountain goats, beer, and logistics: a game &#8211; Logistics for health and aid: A humourless lot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 05:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=193#comment-10016</guid>
		<description>[...] and operations research (although I think having more of these people would be a great thing, for various reasons); but I do maintain that you will need to do a lot of reading on the subject if you ever want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and operations research (although I think having more of these people would be a great thing, for various reasons); but I do maintain that you will need to do a lot of reading on the subject if you ever want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Keizer</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Keizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=193#comment-550</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-488&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@cynan_sez&lt;/a&gt; 
Would you have specific examples, Cynan? I am always looking for real-life illustrations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-488" rel="nofollow">@cynan_sez</a><br />
Would you have specific examples, Cynan? I am always looking for real-life illustrations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynan_sez</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>cynan_sez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=193#comment-488</guid>
		<description>your point about scalability is a good one. applies in INGO financial management too. I often see donor-required project audits demand changes (eg in treasury/cash account management) that would be fine if we had systems and processes that only managed 1,2 even 20 projects. not so good for 800 or so though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your point about scalability is a good one. applies in INGO financial management too. I often see donor-required project audits demand changes (eg in treasury/cash account management) that would be fine if we had systems and processes that only managed 1,2 even 20 projects. not so good for 800 or so though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Humourless Lot&#187; How to get things done: more on the logistics of logistics</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>A Humourless Lot&#187; How to get things done: more on the logistics of logistics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=193#comment-480</guid>
		<description>[...] my previous post on why logistics seems to be so prone to &#8220;herding cats&#8221; problem (thanks, Laura Walker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post on why logistics seems to be so prone to &#8220;herding cats&#8221; problem (thanks, Laura Walker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Keizer</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2009/the-logistics-of-logistics-or-why-logistics-solutions-never-work-here/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Keizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=193#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Just realised: here in Australia, electricians are called &quot;sparkies&quot;. Perhaps they do experiment with insulation techniques here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just realised: here in Australia, electricians are called &#8220;sparkies&#8221;. Perhaps they do experiment with insulation techniques here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

