<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/</link>
	<description>Logistics for global health and aid</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Intentions Are Not Enough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coordination after a disaster</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-47905</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Intentions Are Not Enough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Coordination after a disaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-47905</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers have already written on issues affecting coordination including Michael Kaizer in A Humourless Lot and Alanna Shaikh in her UN Dispatch post. Both were in response to criticisms made in an editorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers have already written on issues affecting coordination including Michael Kaizer in A Humourless Lot and Alanna Shaikh in her UN Dispatch post. Both were in response to criticisms made in an editorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good Intentions Are Not Enough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting articles and posts &#8211; late January</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-47904</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Intentions Are Not Enough &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting articles and posts &#8211; late January</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-47904</guid>
		<description>[...] Lancing the boil? The Lancet on the aid industry &#8211; A Humourless Lot&#8230; &#8211; A response to the Lancet&#8217;s criticism of international aid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lancing the boil? The Lancet on the aid industry &#8211; A Humourless Lot&#8230; &#8211; A response to the Lancet&#8217;s criticism of international aid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Keizer</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Keizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19904</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-19902&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dr. Alden Kurtz &lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks, for that comment, Dr. Kurtz.

Could I use this opportunity to congratulate you with the sterling work of HRI? As far as I am concerned, your organisation is a shining light for us all, right up there with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inepd.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;INEPD&lt;/a&gt;. I am honoured that you have taken the effort to comment in my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-19902" rel="nofollow">@Dr. Alden Kurtz </a><br />
Thanks, for that comment, Dr. Kurtz.</p>
<p>Could I use this opportunity to congratulate you with the sterling work of HRI? As far as I am concerned, your organisation is a shining light for us all, right up there with <a href="http://www.inepd.org/" rel="nofollow">INEPD</a>. I am honoured that you have taken the effort to comment in my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Alden Kurtz</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19902</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Alden Kurtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19902</guid>
		<description>bastards - they just try to pick on us forgetting that we&#039;re putting our lives in danger and so on and should be above scrutiny if you ask me. 

&quot;It seems increasingly obvious that many aid agencies sometimes act according to their own best interests rather than in the interests of individuals whom they claim to help.&quot;, they say. Lies!

On behalf of HRI, can i please deny that? i propose we&#039;ll then get angry, just before offering the Lancet a bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bastards &#8211; they just try to pick on us forgetting that we&#8217;re putting our lives in danger and so on and should be above scrutiny if you ask me. </p>
<p>&#8220;It seems increasingly obvious that many aid agencies sometimes act according to their own best interests rather than in the interests of individuals whom they claim to help.&#8221;, they say. Lies!</p>
<p>On behalf of HRI, can i please deny that? i propose we&#8217;ll then get angry, just before offering the Lancet a bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haiti Earthquake Issues- A Reader &#171; WanderLust</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19836</link>
		<dc:creator>Haiti Earthquake Issues- A Reader &#171; WanderLust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19836</guid>
		<description>[...] written good responses to an article in the Lancet criticising the aid industry, which you can read here and here, while AidWatch, a site dedicated to holding humanitarians accountable to best aid [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written good responses to an article in the Lancet criticising the aid industry, which you can read here and here, while AidWatch, a site dedicated to holding humanitarians accountable to best aid [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19588</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael_Keizer: New post: Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry http://bit.ly/5mRcOS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael_Keizer: New post: Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry <a href="http://bit.ly/5mRcOS.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5mRcOS..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention A Humourless Lot» Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry – Logistics for global health and aid: A Humourless Lot -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19576</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention A Humourless Lot» Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry – Logistics for global health and aid: A Humourless Lot -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19576</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robbo and Michael Keizer, Michael Keizer. Michael Keizer said: New post: Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry http://bit.ly/5mRcOS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robbo and Michael Keizer, Michael Keizer. Michael Keizer said: New post: Lancing a boil? The Lancet on the aid industry <a href="http://bit.ly/5mRcOS" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5mRcOS</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynan</title>
		<link>http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/2010/lancing-a-boil-the-lancet-on-the-aid-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-19575</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelkeizer.com/humourless/?p=894#comment-19575</guid>
		<description>I just find this really quite odd. 
The genuine global image, brand and basis of the Lancet is one of scientific rigour. But this editorial screed is playing on that reputation to slag off a strawman of the aid industry and unnamed corporate-ish aid agencies, sans supporting evidence or particulars of any kind.

I agree there are genuine questions, and tsunami-like problems of an NGO scrum in Haiti emerging. There are some NGOs who should be taking a f..king hard look at whether they should be there. Unfortunately I can see a least one DEC member agency in this category. 

But this level of unsupported generalization would not be tolerated in one of the Lancet&#039;s articles, and shouldn&#039;t be happning on their editorial page either. 

I&#039;m also trying to be very restrained in what might seem an ad hominem attack, querying what particular expertise the editor of a science journal brigs to humanitarian practice anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just find this really quite odd.<br />
The genuine global image, brand and basis of the Lancet is one of scientific rigour. But this editorial screed is playing on that reputation to slag off a strawman of the aid industry and unnamed corporate-ish aid agencies, sans supporting evidence or particulars of any kind.</p>
<p>I agree there are genuine questions, and tsunami-like problems of an NGO scrum in Haiti emerging. There are some NGOs who should be taking a f..king hard look at whether they should be there. Unfortunately I can see a least one DEC member agency in this category. </p>
<p>But this level of unsupported generalization would not be tolerated in one of the Lancet&#8217;s articles, and shouldn&#8217;t be happning on their editorial page either. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also trying to be very restrained in what might seem an ad hominem attack, querying what particular expertise the editor of a science journal brigs to humanitarian practice anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
